Game footage fills in a good chunk of the documentary as well. The rest of the film is rounded out with various individual interviews, which include both Brady and Woodson individually, Bill Belichick, Walt Anderson (the referee who overturned the call), and various players from that game. I’m not so sure a similarly-planned doc leaning so heavily on two former players talking in a living room about an old game would be as compelling, but Brady and Woodson certainly do a pretty admirable job keeping things light and interesting. It was more or less a good podcast episode. Was there a missed penalty on the play? Perhaps two? Did the Raiders know the Patriots’ play-call through some stealthy gamesmanship?īrady and Woodson unpack and debate every level of minutia from that game, and they generally do it engagingly. As much as people may think they can recall the particulars of that game and play, the film surfaces a lot of forgotten - or previously unknown - details. The film really hinges on the Brady and Woodson on-screen chemistry, and the pair have a mostly fun and constructive time reliving the infamous play. Get your popcorn ready ? the debate: #ItWasAFumble or #ItWasIncomplete ? That’s mostly it! I’m sure ESPN was quite happy reviewing the shooting budget on this one. And it wraps up as they move around to the patio to discuss further and play some pool. They reconnect, they sit down to watch the game together, and they argue a good deal (sometimes it teeters on uncomfortable, but most of the time it’s light-hearted). The Tuck Rule follows a really simple recipe- the bulk of the film is Charles Woodson and Tom Brady hanging out at Brady’s ridiculously big and nice home. It’s funny at certain parts and never wades into too serious or too intense. Recent installments centered around Mike Vick’s dogfighting scandal, Lance Armstrong’s doping, Oscar Pistorius’ murder trial, and the wrongful conviction of Jonathan Irons, who’s now married to Maya Moore.įor those longing for what I outlined above, The Tuck Rule is a quick watch. The subject matter is sports-centric and doesn’t revolve around any serious nefarious criminal behavior or social issues.The film centers around a major sport and a well-known event that most people have some baseline memory or understanding of.Of the nine other 30 for 30 films that have come out since 2020, four of them have been multi-episode installments, with most others clocking in longer than one hour. It’s a one-night, hour-long watch with commercials.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |